A NAÏVE DREAM OF A COMMON PSYCHOGEOGRAPHY FOR OTAKUS & EMERGING ARTISTS WITHIN & ALONGSIDE THE (PARA)INSTITUTION(S) – This manifesto is further effort to build a naïve (para/post/non)political(?) myth(?) unfaithful to ‘feminism’, socialism(?), and materialism(?). Unfaithful not as blasphemy is unfaithful, there is nothing intrinsically negative about reverent worship. The postmodern, hyper-ironic position is not the only game in town. Reverent worship has always seemed to require taking things very seriously. I know no better stance to adopt from within the conservative, traditionalist gaze of Harold Bloom (and/or his students), including the gaze of aesthetes such as Donald Kuspit (and/or his students). Reverent worship can protect one from the moral majority within, while still insisting on the desire and need for community. Reverent worship is apostasy. Inhabiting the naïve position is about contradictions that do not resolve into larger wholes, even dialectically (in other words – actually), about the ease of letting go incompatible things because both or all are unnecessary and untrue. Inhabiting a naïve space is about humour and not-so-serious play. It may not be a rhetorical strategy nor a political method, but I would like to see it more honoured within (para)institutions such as University of California, University of Greenwich, CalArts, Goldsmiths College, and artist-run utopias in and around London and Los Angeles. At the centre of my naïve postpostmodern faith, my reverent worship, are two images: the Otaku and the emerging artist.
And now, the touch of
Paprika. The otaku came before the cyborg. If a cyborg is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction (and dreams) – then, the otaku is the naïve, childlike creator of this cybernetic organism – for the otaku lit(t)erally created the technology to dovetail the real and the unreal, to actualize the impossible. Liberation does not simply rest on the construction of consciousness (or the unconscious, for that matter), but the imaginative apprehension, of the “unconscious not as the preserve of wild drives that have to be tamed by the ego, but the site where a traumatic truth speaks out. [Anime is effectively that site] Therein lies Lacan’s version of Freud’s motto
Wo es war, soll ich werden (Where it was, I am to become): not ‘The ego should conquer the id’, the site of the unconscious drives, but ‘I should dare to approach the site of my truth.’ What awaits me ‘there’ [Gina Clark’s 7 March 2006 & 26 April 2007 Stevenson Blanche Gallery performance] is not a deep Truth that I have to identify with, but an unbearable truth that I have to learn to live with.”
Slavoj Zizek, How to Read Lacan, Great Britain: Granta 2006, p. 3.
by Maxi Kim
photo by Gerard Olson